Resource

What you exclude is often more important than what you include

Once you play around with LinkedIn ads for a while, you realise there are many hidden landmines in audience targeting.

Job supertitles pulling in many irrelevant job titles. Competitors, recruiters and jobseekers visiting your website or company page. Too large or too small companies you can't serve.

LinkedIn targeting is precise, compared to other social platforms, but it is not that precise. So for a campaign to be efficient, you have to add a lot of exclusions. People you do not want to reach.

I generally exclude across these 5 categories. Customers, competitors, company sizes, job titles, industries.

Why?

Exclusions on LinkedIn are “hard” enforced compared to inclusions which are “soft” enforced. LinkedIn treats your inclusions like recommendations.

E.g. if you want to target companies only 51-200 in size, LinkedIn will still include companies outside these parameters. You have to add all other company sizes as exclusions.

There is inherent waste in all mass media platforms, it will never be perfect. But you can at least reduce it by going heavy on exclusions.

See other resources:

Complexity sells, but simple is what you need

October 2, 2025
READ THE STORY

Your bid is not your final CPC cost - you almost always pay less

September 9, 2025
READ THE STORY

Cheap CPC does not mean cheap CPL

November 12, 2025
READ THE STORY